13 Theses for Religious Pluralism, Dr. Perry Schmidt-Leukel

Thesis 1: In terms of our awareness of religions the world has become
significantly smaller and each country significantly larger.
Thesis 2: Both, the factual presence and the awareness of religious diversity will continue to grow for an unforeseeable length of time.
Thesis 3: The religious challenge of religious diversity emerges from the
necessity to engage with the perception of different messages of salvation and corresponding truth claims.
Thesis 4: For logical reasons there are only four basic options on how to
interpret religious truth claims, and only three of them constitute religious
Thesis 5: Prima facie religious diversity seems to support an atheist/naturalist interpretation of religion.
Thesis 6: Exclusivism is the weakest of all possible options.
Thesis 7. Compared to exclusivism, inclusivism is only half-hearted progress.
Thesis 8: Pluralism avoids the weak points of the two alternative options and represents a worthy alternative to atheism.
Thesis 9: Religious pluralism is not relativism.
Thesis 10: Religious pluralism is not in principle opposition to the actual
Thesis 11: Religious pluralism substantiates a new understanding of theology as ‘interreligious theology’.
Thesis 12: Religious pluralism offers a partial solution of the religious
potential for conflicts.
Thesis 13: On the social and political level the principle of tolerance takes
precedence over religious pluralism.


One thought on “13 Theses for Religious Pluralism, Dr. Perry Schmidt-Leukel

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s